Positively Illogical: The Absurdity of Naturalistic Ethics
Via the evangelical outpost: "This is not to say, of course, that naturalists can't act in ways that are ethically or morally good; they just have no reason for doing so. Perhaps, though, we should be careful about pointing this out. After all, do we really want naturalists to live in a way that would be truly consistent with their beliefs? Given the choice, I'll take an illogical, self-deluded naturalist over a logical, clear-eyed nihilist." Read why
2 Comments:
Sounds like the only inconsistency within Naturalism is personal responsibility. Remove that and you have a perfectly consistent world view, no?
No. The problem is, you can't make assertions about anything if you don't believe anything.
Post a Comment
<< Home